Professional Guide to Radar Selection in Anti-drone

December 1, 2025

Latest company case about Professional Guide to Radar Selection in Anti-drone
Professional Guide to Radar Selection in Counter-Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS)

Within an integrated Anti-Drone system, radar serves as the crucial long-range detection and early warning sensor, responsible for discovering, identifying, and continuously tracking drone targets at a distance. Selecting the appropriate radar is the first step in building an effective defense architecture.

Chapter 1: Core Considerations
1.1 Target Characteristics Analysis

Radar Cross-Section (RCS): Typical consumer drone RCS ranges from 0.001 m² to 0.01 m². Radar must possess excellent weak signal detection capabilities.

Flight Modalities: Must effectively capture complex flight states such as hovering, very low-speed flight, high-speed maneuvers, and swarm tactics.

1.2 Tactical Performance Requirements

Detection Airspace: Define the required coverage in terms of operational range, azimuth angle (omnidirectional/sector), and elevation angle range.

Resolution Capability: Encompasses range resolution and angular resolution, directly impacting multi-target discrimination and identification accuracy.

Identification Features: Whether it possesses micro-Doppler analysis capability is key to distinguishing drones from birds and identifying drone types.

1.3 Deployment and Environmental Adaptability

Deployment Mode: Differentiate between fixed, mobile/vehicle-mounted, and portable/man-portable types, which dictate radar size, weight, and power constraints.

Operational Environment: Different environments (urban, suburban, coastal, plains) have distinct clutter interference characteristics (buildings, vehicles, birds, weather). The radar must possess corresponding clutter suppression and anti-jamming capabilities.

1.4 Integration and Compliance

System Integration: Radar must provide standardized data interfaces (e.g., ASTERIX, NMEA) to ensure seamless synergy with the Command and Control (C2) system, electro-optical units, and radio frequency countermeasure units.

Spectrum Compliance: The operating frequency band must comply with local radio management regulations to avoid causing electromagnetic interference.

                                        latest company case about [#aname#]

Chapter 2: Comparison of Mainstream Technology Paths
Technology Type Core Advantages Potential Limitations Typical Application Scenarios
Pulse-Doppler Radar Mature technology, high reliability, good moving target detection capability, long range. Limited detection capability against hovering/slow targets, relatively lower resolution, typically larger size and power consumption. Persistent airspace surveillance (e.g., airport perimeter), Fixed point defense.
FMCW Radar Excellent detection of stationary & slow targets (can detect hovering drones), low power consumption, compact size, cost-effective, high range resolution. Traditional FMCW range is relatively short, susceptible to strong clutter interference. Short/Medium-range mobile deployment, Low-altitude gap-filler in urban environments, Portable systems.
Phased Array Radar Electronic scanning (no mechanical rotation), very fast response, high multi-target tracking capability, high reliability (no moving parts). High cost, system complexity. High-end military applications, Protecting high-value targets, counter-swarm attacks.
MIMO Radar Virtual aperture, achieves very high angular resolution, excellent multi-target discrimination and tracking, strong anti-jamming capability. Relatively new technology, complex processing algorithms, higher cost. High-precision tracking in complex environments (e.g., urban), Differentiating densely flying drone swarms.
Millimeter-Wave Radar Very high resolution (range & angle), compact size/weight, superior micro-Doppler feature extraction capability. Range significantly affected by atmospheric attenuation (especially rain/fog), relatively shorter detection range. Fine detection and identification for the last line of defense, Integration with EO systems for fire-control level accuracy.
Chapter 3: Selection Process Guide
Step 1: Requirements Analysis
  • Define the Mission: What is being protected? (e.g., government building, airport, stadium, border).
  • Delineate the Area: What is the protection range? (e.g., radius 500m, 2km, 10km?).
  • Identify the Threat: What types of drones are the primary concern? (consumer quadcopters, fixed-wing, homemade, swarms?).
  • Analyze the Environment: Where will it be deployed? (city center, suburbs, coastline, mountainous area?).
Step 2: Performance Matching

Determine Core Metrics:

  • Minimum Detectable RCS: Must at least be able to reliably detect targets of 0.01 m².
  • Maximum Operational Range: Based on the area defined in Step 1, allowing sufficient warning and reaction time.
  • False Alarm Rate: Requires a very low false alarm rate to avoid frequent system triggering by birds, vehicles, etc.
  • Key Functions: Is micro-Doppler recognition and hover detection mandatory?
Step 3: Deployment & Integration Assessment
  • Mobility Requirements: Fixed, vehicle-mounted, or portable?
  • Power Consumption & Supply: Mains power, vehicle power, or batteries?
  • Integration Interface: Confirm the radar's output protocol is compatible with existing or planned C2 systems.
Step 4: Cost & Supplier Evaluation
  • Total Cost of Ownership: Consider acquisition, installation, maintenance, and upgrade costs.
  • Supplier Reputation: Choose suppliers with proven track records and good technical support.
  • Testing & Validation: Strongly recommend conducting field tests to verify radar performance in real-world environments, especially its performance in complex clutter conditions.

                                                         latest company case about [#aname#]

Chapter 4: Recommended Solutions for Typical Scenarios
Application Scenario Recommended Radar Type Key Rationale
Urban Point Defense
(e.g., gov't buildings, embassies)
MIMO Radar or Advanced FMCW Radar Superior urban clutter suppression, high resolution for discriminating dense targets, good micro-Doppler identification capability.
Large Event Security
(e.g., Olympics, G20)
Layered Defense:
1. Long-Range: Pulse-Doppler Radar
2. Short-Range/Core Zone: FMCW/MIMO Radar
Long-range provides wide-area situational awareness; short-range high-precision radar handles accurate identification and low-altitude gap-filling in the core zone.
Border & Critical Infrastructure Patrol
(e.g., airports, power plants)
Medium-Long Range Pulse-Doppler Radar or Phased Array Radar Long range provides continuous wide-area surveillance against various aerial threats.
Mobile/Field Air Defense
(e.g., accompanying forces)
Vehicle-Mounted FMCW Radar or Portable Millimeter-Wave Radar Rapid deployment, low power consumption, compact size/weight, effective against hovering and slow-moving small drones.
Low-Cost/Portable Solution
(e.g., dismounted units, forward posts)
Portable FMCW/Millimeter-Wave Radar Low cost, portable, battery-powered, meets basic detection and warning needs.
Conclusion

Radar is the information cornerstone of a C-UAS system, but it does not operate in isolation. The optimal solution stems from precise analysis of one's own mission requirements and careful matching of technological options. Ultimately, a successful C-UAS system relies on the deep integration and synergy of radar, electro-optical, radio frequency detection, and soft/hard kill measures under unified command.

Get in touch with us
Contact Person : Yuzi
Tel : +86 13670255641
Characters Remaining(20/3000)